| Today is July 29, 2010 |
I love Ghostbusters. I have since I was a kid, rolling around in the back of my parents’ hatchback — sans car seat because it was rural Montana in 1984, you know — and listening to Ray Parker Jr. sing “Ghostbusters” on the radio, silently committing the words to eternal memory.
I’m not a fanatic, though. I don’t talk about the movie like Kevin Smith characters talk about Star Wars. My heart doesn’t start racing at the thought of watching the DVD. I don’t write fan fiction in the hopes that Bill Murray will read my pissant little story and decide to revive the long-dead film series. I don’t own a prop replica proton pack or dress up in tan jumpsuits for Halloween. I don’t attend conventions or participate in online forums.
I do none of those things, yet I still love Ghostbusters because the films and their cartoons, toys and other accompaniments haunt my childhood and mark the point when I broke out of the containment unit of innocence and flew headlong into a larger and less innocent world.
I wasn’t very old in 1984. I can’t remember if I ever actually saw Ghostbusters in the theater. I doubt it, considering how reluctant my parents were to drive 25 miles into the city for any reason, let alone to take their son go a popcorny blockbuster. My awareness of the movie most likely came from HBO, which also introduced me to soft-core porn and Mel Brooks movies.
I can’t count the number of times I have seen the movie since then. Ghostbusters is one of those films I feel compelled to watch whenever I happen upon it on television. Like a man possessed, I put down the remote and patiently wait for classic lines like “Back off man, I’m a scientist,” “Print is dead,” and “Whoa, Egon, you said crossing the streams was bad!”
My enthusiasm for the Ghostbusters even slimed the sequel. I was present at the first showing of Ghostbusters II in August 1989 in Billings, Montana. My poor grandmother and I were, of course, the only people actually waiting at the theater for the Friday afternoon matinee to start. I guess being the first person to see the new Ghostbusters film just wasn’t as important to anybody else.
Both movies were ultimately aimed at kids, or at least the merchandise that filled my childhood bedroom was. I had all the toys I could get my hands on — all the toys I could convince my parents to buy for me, that is. I had the proton pack, a hollow plastic shell decorated with stickers and a long piece of yellow foam that was supposed to be the weapon’s neutron beam. I also had the toy PKE meter, the surprisingly well-designed Ghost Trap, and even a little iron-on Ghostbusters patch secured to my T-shirt with scotch tape.
It was all the gear a solitary boy needed to pretend he was a Ghostbuster as he played in the hallway of his family’s trailer house while his parents marched toward divorce or while his father drank himself to death in his grandmother’s spare bedroom.
Oh, I had the action figures too, some of the original figures as well as the Ecto-1 car and some of the silly Ghostbusters-in-space action figures Kenner put out once the toy company realized that the Ghostbusters franchise was a cash cow.
Then there was “The Real Ghostbusters,” the cartoon based on the films (so named because some other show I never saw held the trademark on the name “The Ghost Busters”) I loved that show. It has probably had more of an impact on my life than any other product of pop culture during the past four decades. And that’s saying something, especially coming from a man who learned some of life’s important skills not from parents but from TV shows — like shaving, tying a tie, roundhouse-kicking drug dealers and disarming bombs with duct tape.
I watched the show religiously, every Saturday morning at my grandmother’s house, right after “Garfield and Friends” and right before “Looney Toons.” I carefully noted details about the characters’ lives — more note than the show’s writers likely took, writers who probably didn’t give a hoot about continuity on a Japanimated children’s cartoon.
I remember, for example, that Peter loved trains so much that he studied engineering for a year in college before realizing the field had little to do with trains. I also remember Ray’s theory, borrowed from some philosopher whose name, oddly, didn’t stick in my memory, that if you sit in one place long enough, everyone you’ve ever known will eventually pass by.
I knew the characters’ voices. I noticed big changes in the show, like when disappointing new actors replaced the originals. I noticed when the show replaced Ray Parker Jr.’s version of the theme song with a cover. I was ecstatic any time the cartoon referenced the movies — which happened about four times that I can remember. I didn’t know it at the time, but the show was preparing me for a life spent sorting out the canonical details of ever geekier escapist shows like “Star Trek” and “The X-Files.”
But, just as I was growing old enough to appreciate some of the darker humor in the cartoon (and concurrently learning a deeper appreciation for some of the adult humor in the movies), the end began. Just like Phillip Seymour Hoffman says in Cameron Crowe’s Almost Famous when explaining that rock and roll is dead, “You got here just in time for the death rattle, the last gasp, the last grope.”
Ghostbusters’ slow death began in 1988, even before the disappointing and overly slimy Ghostbusters II hit theaters, when a one-hour block of Ghostbusters cartoons was transformed into “Slimer and the Real Ghostbusters.”
Before the Slimer years, the show had cool plots involving satanic forces, real urban myths and other adult concepts, such as Sam Hein, the spirit of Halloween, or the ghost of the fictional Sherlock Holmes, made real by our belief in him. Heck, I even loved the fact that in the opening credits, Winston is enjoying a beer and a burger before being interrupted by a call. Those little details helped me see, that dark forces and other bad things in life can and should be fodder for comedy. Those details about the show, the ones that didn’t assume children needed to be entertained by bright colors and simplistic plots, kept me coming back year after year.
But when Slimer usurped the Ghostbusters and “became the special man,” we lost the plots about cross-dimensional rips and Native American folklore. Instead we got Slimer and the motley collection of neighborhood kids trying to escape a bulldog and some conniving, Gargamel-like villain. Small-town antics in a show that used to be very much rooted in the New York of the movies. Seriously.
(Full disclosure: I did enjoy Slimer’s Ecto Cooler flavor of Hi-C for years and would drink the hell out of it if they still made it.)
But not even Slimer could save the Ghostbusters from the 1990s. Ghostbusters II did little to buoy the franchise, which was beset by rivals, especially the Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles. Then, in 1990, Congress passed the Children’s Television Act, mandating that TV aimed at kids have some sort of educational content, that it pass on “valuable information and skills.” By 1991, both “The Real Ghostbusters” and “Slimer” were dead and their ghosts were stowed safely in the containment unit.
I grew up with the Ghostbusters. Not long after the cartoon went off the air, when my mom and I moved to a town a couple miles away from where I spent most of my childhood and when I no longer spent weekends at my grandma’s house, I stopped watching Saturday morning cartoons. It was too disappointing without the Ghostbusters and other classics like Bugs Bunny, and besides, there was puberty and girls to contend with.
The past always looks best, of course. I’m no doubt pining away for some imagined past that always looks better in hindsight, regardless of what was actually going on in the background. Memory is selective in that way. Things in memory are always painted in vivid colors than they reflected in real life.
Regardless, the Ghostbusters were with me through those transitional years, and my late childhood will always be haunted with proton packs and Egon Spengler action figures.
And, thanks to the Ghostbusters, I know that death — like the death of Hamlet’s father or my own — lives just beneath the surface of everything we do. Even if we don’t talk about it, death reminds us subconsciously of our mortalities and the impermanence of all things human. In the face of that undiscovered country, that terrifying eternal sleep, the ultimate dissolution of all things we thought were permanent and lasting, we are left with no other sane option but mockery.
We have to grant ourselves the strength to laugh at the things we cannot change, and when the ghosts of our buried pasts come back to haunt us, sometimes we must remember that the door swings both ways and have the strength to cross the steams and blow the damned things back to hell.
This text was written in response to the Ghosts nudge and was published on October 14, 2008.